Topic: Designing
a Simple Loss Function for Central Banks: Does a Dual Mandate Make Sense?
Speaker:Jinill Kim,
Professor, Department of Economics, Korea University
Date: October
24 (Wednesday)
Time: 10:00-11:30am
Location: Building 4 Room 101
Language: English
Abstract:
Yes, it makes a lot of
sense. This paper studies how to design simple loss functions for central
banks, as parsimonious approximations to social welfare. We show, both
analytically and quantitatively, that simple loss functions should feature a
high weight on measures of economic activity, sometimes even larger than the
weight on inflation. Two main factors drive our result. First, stabilising
economic activity also stabilises other welfare-relevant variables. Second, the
estimated model features mitigated inflation distortions due to a low
elasticity of substitution between monopolistic goods and a low interest rate
sensitivity of demand. The result holds up in the presence of measurement
errors, with large shocks that generate a trade-o¤ between stabilising inflation
and resource utilisation, and also when imposing a moderate degree of interest
rate volatility.
About the speaker:
Yes, it makes a lot of
sense. This paper studies how to design simple loss functions for central
banks, as parsimonious approximations to social welfare. We show, both
analytically and quantitatively, that simple loss functions should feature a
high weight on measures of economic activity, sometimes even larger than the
weight on inflation. Two main factors drive our result. First, stabilising
economic activity also stabilises other welfare-relevant variables. Second, the
estimated model features mitigated inflation distortions due to a low
elasticity of substitution between monopolistic goods and a low interest rate
sensitivity of demand. The result holds up in the presence of measurement
errors, with large shocks that generate a trade-o¤ between stabilising inflation
and resource utilisation, and also when imposing a moderate degree of interest
rate volatility.